-----Original Message-----
From: John Burden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 3:10 PM
To: Lester Herrington
Subject: RE: Input on NAI's Gauntlet Firewall/VPN...
You can't run Cybercop server on the same machine as Gauntlet so you will
have to rely on the server
and firewall logs for intrusion detection. The scanner is OK, tech support
could be much better.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lester Herrington
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 8:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Lester Herrington
Subject: Input on NAI's Gauntlet Firewall/VPN...
We are considering our options for a firewall/vpn solution to connect and
protect our two sites. We have looked at several options and are
considering NAI's Gauntlett 5.5 firewall with PGP protected VPN over the
internet. Wanted to get some input before we proceed.
Here are some parameters...
Protect four locations with Firewalls 2 locations and 2 Off site web
locations.
Connect network 1(110 Users) to network 2(50 Users) with a VPN using the
public internet.
Connect 15 remote users via dial-up and VPN.
The Gauntlet solution appears to be a complete solution providing Firewall,
VPN, Monitoring(Cybercop). I have heard that this is one of the most secure
firewalls available, but have not seen solid data supporting this.
Thanks for any input that you can provide.
Les
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
