> Another very good supplimentary tool, used in linux, is the netstat tool
> used in such a fashion:
> 
>                              #netstat -veenp | more
> 
> the reason for the pipe is that you will get tons of info on ports,
> datagrams,unix connections, you name it.  You will actually see what process
> has ownership to what object or process in linux.  Some builds of linux's
> netstat command does not support the "p" flag though.  I suppose you can do
> this netstat during a supposed recipient of an exploit or if things seems
> wierd.
> 
> Now, I use a program called 'check-ps' that checks for proc's and ps's
> structure and kills unknown processes.  I'll let you know now that if you
> install this program and do not daemonize it, it'll leave hard to delete
> temp folders/directories like this:
> 
>                                 . ???!??????000!!  ??
> 
> Is that wild or what???!!  Guess i'll need to contact the creator for tips
> on these directory deletions.
 
try rm ".*\?*"  < removes any file beginning with a dot and containing a literal '?'.
use rmdir or rm -r to get rid of misnamed directories...

Note: this looks like a bad bug in the  program, you should  not run this one
as root.

> >Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:34:03 -0500 
> >From: "Baribault, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >Subject: Re: Fwd: TrinityOS SUID results for Jan 26
> >
> >Looks like I can relax and look for a modified solution for the SUID 
> >comparisson. I was bitten by an irregularity in the LS command.. (See
> below)
> >
> >Thank you all again for the prompt responses. I can cancel the order for 
> >tranquilizers. 
> >
> >Gary B 
> >
> >BTW is anyone else running into this problem of doing a diff on the results
> 
> >of a LS command? 
> >
> >
> >At 01:28 PM 2/14/00 -0600, you wrote: 
> >>Looks like you are getting bit by the ls(1) command.  The way it behaves, 
> >>is that anything older than a given time frame (typically six months) is 
> >>displayed with a year, and anything younger is displayed with the time. 
> >>Also Future dates are displayed with the year. 
> >> 
> >>If you are checking for date changes, you should probably have a perl 
> >>script that can check the EPOCH date value, and also do things like 
> >>MD5(1) checksums. 
> >> 
> >>There are a few freeware products out there that already do this type of 
> >>stuff. 
> >> 
> >>Hope this helps. 
> >> 
> >>-- 
> >>Chris Riney                     E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >>Tandy Information Services 
> >>Tandy Technology Sqr, Suite 200 
> >>Fort Worth, TX 76102             Phone: 817/415-0308; 8:00am-5:00pm
> CST,Mo-Fr 
> >>*** NOTICE: This in no way authorizes use of This E-mail address, 
> >>***   or any mentioned in this message, to be included in any Mailing
> list!  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
> Visit http://freeworld.excite.com
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 


-- 
Juergen P. Meier                        email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Class GmbH Firmengruppe                 phone: +49 172 8379103
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to