I totally agree,

BUT!@#, I would really like to know what software you are running that tells you that 
you are beeing scanned and exactly what torjan they are trying to find... =)

Peter.


On Fri, 18 February 2000, "Floyd Moore" wrote:

> 
> It gives me great pleasure to report an "individual" who is scanning
> for a Trojan. Even more to have their time wasted trying to penetrate.
> It must be frustrating for them.  Then even more to find they have
> been contacted.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael E. Cummins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Firewalls Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 6:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Spock: We are being Scanned Captain:-))
> 
> 
> > door is say unlocked and the passer by sees that.. IMHO the
> punishable
> > per se crime does not occur until the said individual actually opens
> the
> > door physically/virtually and jumps into the vehicle 'without keys
> and
> > authorization'  naturally. then the meter starts running and the
> > infringements
> > begin to occur..
> 
> First off, I am not the law and I am not punishing anyone.  When I see
> someone advancing in a threatening manner I take measures to obfuscate
> myself and report the matter to the appropriate authorities minus the
> overboard "Chicken Little" panic.
> 
> Secondly, if someone is walking up and down the beach eying everyone's
> car
> door locks, I would rather have my eye on *them*
> 
> Thirdly, if you *must* explain everything with analogies...  Viewing
> the car
> lock is a passive act.  Scanning my ports is an active act, and a
> malicious
> one at that if it is obvious to me that you are looking for machines
> that
> are infected with Trojans.  I think that Frederick is dead on with
> *his*
> analogy about jiggling the doorknobs.  If someone jiggles *my*
> doorknobs, I
> want to have security cameras on the building 24/7 and a Billy Jo-Bob
> Redneck running around the premises with a shotgun!
> 
> It all boils down to, methinks, a difference of opinion between
> corrective
> and preventive security measures.  It seems to me that you recommend
> being
> violated before taking action, that you view reacting to port scans as
> an
> infringement on basic community rights and freedoms.  I recommend a
> standoffish but very-aware attitude unless the intruder is obviously
> looking
> for something nefarious, as was my case.  (A pretty poor attempt if
> the
> words "NetBus-Pro and Backdoor-G1" actually show up in my logs)  Any
> attempt
> to profile my system will result in a short letter to the offender's
> ISP, if
> it can be identified.  This will at least contribute to weeding out
> the
> moronic script kiddies.  If the intruder is spoofing his probe to
> begin
> with, you've got more worries anyway.  In *that* case I suppose the
> best
> offense is a good defense.
> 
> Is this true, or do you wish to further clarify your point?
> 
> Please post to the group, this is fascinating stuff.
> 
>  ,_,
> (O,O)
> (   )
> -"-"---------------------------------------------------------------
> | From the Desk of Michael E. Cummins |
> | |
> | WEBSITE: http://www.i-magery.com |
> | E-MAIL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | |
> | "The main thing is to keep the main thing, the main thing" |
> | - Albert Einstein |
> | |
> | "Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes" |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ====================================================
> And for you automated email spammers out there,
> here are the email addresses of the current board of
> the Federal Communications Commission:
> Chairman William Kennard: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Commissioner Susan Ness: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Commissioner Michael Powell: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Commissioner Gloria Tristani: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And let's help you send some spam to the USPS, too:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ====================================================
> 
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]


__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to