Re: Packets not destined for my network -reply

[Dave Harris]

Isnt this going against the defense in depth argument?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Chris Brenton wrote:
> >
> > I'm digging Cisco's reflexive filters. Simpler rules, maintains state
> > and seems to go easy on the CPU. Who needs a firewall. ;)
>
> Chris,
>
> Have you done any performance tests yet? Will they support thousands
> or tens of thousands of state-maintained connections?
>
> Also, as I read it, it won't work for anything except simple
> protocols (telnet, SMTP, web).
>
> thanks,
> gary
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]