Oh God,
You had to pose that question to the author of Why Firewalls aren't
Enough..
"Scudamore, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/29/00 06:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ?
Frederick M Avolio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> This is, by the way, one of the kinds of problems
> cited by those of us who believe that stateful
> inspection firewalls are generally insufficient
> for serious security.
Excuse the "newbie to the list" question, but if these
types of firewalls are "generally insufficient", what
type of firewall do you consider to be "sufficient"?
TIA
scud
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Bennett Todd
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Frederick M Avolio
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Ryan Russell
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Paul Cardon
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Ryan Russell
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.... Paul Cardon
- RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Andreas Haug
- RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.... Frederick M Avolio
- RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.... Andreas Haug
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Ryan Russell
- FW: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Mark . Teicher
- FW: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Scudamore, Mike
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Jon Earle
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Alyea
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? Kent Hundley
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply Mark . Teicher
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply Kent Hundley
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply Mark . Teicher
- RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply Mark . Teicher
- Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply Bennett Todd
- RE: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ? -reply carson
