"Aaron C. Springer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good, I am not qualified to help... wish I was.. Don't assume to much dude. I have had lots of people who were not hackers get it going. I mean it's not difficult it's just that if you want to understand *how* it works, you do have to read the code. There are no design docs. > So, does that mean that the most stable most "stateful" open source > packet > filter code is in fact ipfilter?.. I think mine is more stateful -- from what I have read of ipfilter. b. - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Free stateful packet filtering Steve George
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Chris Brenton
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet filte... bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet f... Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet f... bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Ron DuFresne
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Jeff Burson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Gary Flynn
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Chris Brenton
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Ron DuFresne
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Ron DuFresne
