-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Murphy wrote:
> >Also note that the level of evaluation only allows either box to protect (at
> >most) "sensitive but not classified" information.
Absolutely.
> That's par for the course. No MAC enforcement means no classified data.
> Would you *really* use Firewall-1 on NT to connect your top secret network
> to the Internet?
Classified systems aren't connected to the Net ... period.
geoffrey
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Santa Claus,
the Tooth Fairy,
Windows 2000 ...
Some things you just outgrow.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Key fingerprint ===> E8E2 1EC4 6640 1F9A 5A09 0DB6 FC5E BDAA D9CB 6F04
Public key available upon request.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4/x0u/F69qtnLbwQRAgqnAJ9hkdmygCOvEx6fp+tJpzMEONZ79QCgvlY9
HvzzUCzKF+pBkdrLAS8c6Jg=
=aNvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
