In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ron DuFresne writes: > >hasn't it been argued in other threads, somewhat differently that >firewalls are not ment to control insude users so much as to prevent >outside abuse, and that inside use is best constraigned by HR? > Yes, finally some words of wisdom. :-) Some people on this list, however, seem to be oblivious to the mjr's law saying something along the line of "You can't solve social problems with technical means." Firewall is not meant to be a be-all end-all security solution, period. What firewall must do is help you enforce your security policy. Now, you do have security policy in place, right? Best regards, Saso - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Paul D. Robertson
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall David Lang
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Gene Lee
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall John Adams
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Tony Iannotti
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Jochen Kaiser
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall David Lang
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall John Adams
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall aaron
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Ron DuFresne
- RE: ssh defeats the firewall Saso
- RE: ssh defeats the firewall R. Michael Williams
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall David Lang
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Bennett Todd
- RE: ssh defeats the firewall Wrieth, Henry
- RE: ssh defeats the firewall Delcourt, Rick
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Dave Smart/DEF/CSC
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall David Lang
- Re: ssh defeats the firewall Jon Earle
- RE: ssh defeats the firewall Jon Speer
