VRRP does use a virtual IP (VIP) and MAC address. During a failure the VIP
and MAC move from Master to Slave.
I have implemented several of these configurations with little or no effort.
The only time this becomes an issue is if you are trying to run VPN
services. VPN in an H.A. configuration requires the use of FW clusters. This
is a feature available in FW-1v4.1 and is not fully functional until
v4.1SP1/SP2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Johnson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 1:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VRRP on Nokia Firewalls
>
>
> I suppose this is more of a router question than firewall question,
> but given the hardware/software, this seemed like a good place to post.
>
> I have a couple of Nokia routers running FW1 that I would like to
> put into a failover configuration. Checkpoint will handle state
> synchronization, but the actual router failover mechanism is left to the
> VRRP implementation on the Nokias. According to RFC 2338 (as I read it),
> VRRP provides a "master router" whose IP address can be assumed by a
> "backup router."
>
> For example, assume I have a master router at 10.100.20.1 and a backup
> router at 10.100.20.2. If the master router fails, the backup router will
> asssume the IP address 10.100.20.2, and any other configured IP addresses.
>
> HSRP on Cisco equipment works a bit differently; there is a virtual IP
> address shared among two or more routers. On my example above, the
> routers would be configured at 10.100.20.2 and 10.100.20.3, and they
> would share the virtual IP at 10.100.20.1.
>
> My questions are:
> 1. Can VRRP be configured to use a virtual IP address like HSRP?
> 2. Are there any pros/cons to doing this?
> 3. Am I grossly misreading the standards here?
>
> MAJ
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]