I'm not sure about Netscreen, but the weakness of the Watchguard appears to
be global administration. (At least when I looked at it.) There did not
seem to be a really good way to administer a bunch of them at different
sites. Since you mention global implementation, this may be an issue.
If you prefer each firewall to be under the control of a local
administrator, this would not be an issue and Watchguard is an excellent
product for many situations.
Hope this helps,
CB
Dan Robb
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
firewalls-owner@List Subject: Watchguard vs. Netscreen
s.GNAC.NET
27/06/2000 05:07 PM
Please respond to
Dan Robb
Hello all,
I have to recommend firewalls for my company to implement globally. I have
been
looking at the Netscreen-100 and also the WatchGuard Firebox II. I would
like
to hear about any experiences (good AND bad) that anyone has had. I would
also
like to hear about other products that anyone feels are far superior to
either
of those two products.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Watchguard vs. Netscreen Dan Robb
- Re: Watchguard vs. Netscreen parks
- Re: Watchguard vs. Netscreen Mark . Teicher
- Re: Watchguard vs. Netscreen Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Watchguard vs. Netscreen firewalllist
- Re: Watchguard vs. Netscreen Mark . Teicher
- RE: Watchguard vs. Netscreen Ben Nagy
