Netmeeting will still attempt to do direct connects to you illegal address space.  For this reason, your scenario will not work.

On a side note, should we avoid all words that might have an alternate meaning in a society and context that we may have no prior awareness of?  Or should we compile a list of words for the faq, that demonstrates the ones we should not use?  Who would like to compile the list?

Somebody else throw the next faggot on the fire please.

Jack Dingler

Vijay V wrote:

Hi all,

I am facing a queer problem with my Firewall-1 4.0 / Windows NT 4.0 setup.

I have a DMZ style network with the following interfaces:
- an external interface, directly connected to the router.
- an internal interface, connected to my internal LAN.
- the DMZ.

All my machines with valid Internet IP addresses are located on the DMZ.

Recently, I installed a machine running Microsoft ILS server on the DMZ, idea
being that people from Internet as well as my internal network can logon to the
ILS and then do NetMeeting.

The queer part is that if I define a rule-pair: any -> ILS, any, permit and
ILS->any, any, permit, the setup does not work. However, if I define: any ->
ILS, NetMeeting, permit and ILS->any, NetMeeting, permit, ILS works fine and
people can logon but they are not able to establish NetMeeting session. So how can i implement NetMeeting from my internal network (private network)  to outside network. 
Any help would be highly appreciated.

Regards,Vijay
 

Reply via email to