> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Doesn't this defeat the purpose of the Nokia HA if it does
> not support EIGRP at the present time.
>
I don't think so. Nokia HA is for firewall redundancy. Router redundancy
would be handled by, well, the routers.
FWIW...Nokia will probably never support EIGRP.
>
> If one would to redistribute routing
> information from another routing device is that box now
> susceptible to fail over.??
>
I assume by "fail over" you mean "failure". You are corrent, the interior
router now becomes a possible failure point. This must be taken into
account in the implimentation (think HSRP), but it does not defeat the
purpose of having redundant firewalls.
Ken Seefried, CTO & Founding Partner, DigitalMoJo
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
