No, I don't think load-balancing is supported. I think
you definitely need an external device for that.
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Stackhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:39 AM
> To: Johnson, Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FW-1 High Availability
>
>
> Carl,
>
> Thanks. I wonder if the Nokia solution supports
> load balancing in any way similar to Stonebeat?
>
> Brent
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 11:31 AM
> To: 'Brent Stackhouse'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FW-1 High Availability
>
>
> Nokia has it's own High Availability implementation via
> VRRP.
>
> It works very well for basic firewalling. VPN seems to work
> fairly well also. The new UDP encapsulation mode for the
> Checkpoint VPN client does not work with the High Availability
> though. This is a bug and is supposed to be fixed in
> Checkpoint 4.1 SP3 according to Nokia.
>
> Carl
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brent Stackhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 7:46 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: FW-1 High Availability
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to research high-availability
> > solutions for FW-1 and I wondered if anyone
> > has experience with FW-1's built-in HA vs.
> > Stonebeat. I've heard the Check Point HA
> > kind of sucks but I'm thinking about using
> > RealSecure and FW-1 on Nokia boxes and
> > Stonebeat isn't supported on Nokia. Thanks
> > (BTW, I appreciate everyone's advice when I
> > ask this stuff as it gives me some different
> > perspectives to present to management).
> >
> > Brent Stackhouse
> > Security Analyst
> > 2ndWave, Inc.
> > Austin, Texas
> > 512-439-5005
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> >
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
