> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:49:21 -0500 > From: "Johnson, Carl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Sun v Nokia > > The Nokia can backup configurations, run VRRP, has stateful > failover built-in, can do OSPF, BGP, etc. You can hot-swap The stateful failover relies on FW1 to do state sync, so it's not necessarily built-in for Nokia. However, I do agree that Nokia is a very nice platform if you are considering FW1. > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:31:19 -0400 > From: "Keith Brogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Sun v Nokia > > the far superior platform. Ipso(nokia's os) was, I believe, built around > checkpoint, not the other way around. This design lends itself to better Ipso was actually not built around checkpoint. It was an OS built for the original Ipsilon routers which Nokia acquired. It is an OS designed to do fast packet routing. With the new IPSO 3.3, it has enhancements built-in for even faster performance under FW1. Overall Nokia is def'ly a good platform to go with. If you are considering it, I would def'ly want until 3.3 is out. 3.3 has https for management instead of plain http. // Jian -- Jian L. Zhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabi - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
