Eth0/1 will need at least
ip nat inside
The translations to .81, .82, and .83 would not (IMHO) work, since PPP
is point to point, the netmask is, sort of, irrelevant. The isp would
typically use a /32 mask at their end.
Someone may point out a way round this (secondary addressing?) or
routing (statically routing the .81, .82, and .83 via .80 at the ISP
end?)
Regards
-M
Saju Nair wrote:
>
> Part 1.1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Name: hptest1.txt
> hptest1.txt Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
