On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 09:24:57AM -0700, Nancy Davis wrote:
> I disagree. You can open a single host for network
> checking with ping and traceroute, but you certainly
> do not need to let your entire network be vulnerable
> to ICMP probing.
You can always count from 0 to 255. Every Single Host -> whole Network. Of
course this is only true if you dont do masquerading/dyn nat.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD eckes@irc +497257930613 BE5-RIPE
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and c... Olivier Kaloudoff
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types a... Nancy Davis
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP typ... Michael H. Warfield
- RE: List of "safe" ICM... Bill Royds
- RE: List of "safe"... -- neil --
- RE: List of "safe"... Bill Royds
- Re: List of "safe"... Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: List of "safe" ICMP typ... Bill Lavalette
- Re: List of "safe" ICM... Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: List of "safe" ICMP typ... Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Ben Nagy
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Frank Knobbe
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Ben Nagy
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: List of "safe" ICMP types and codes Daniel Harrison
