On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Nagy wrote:
> Interop issues are the least of my worries. I'm waiting for someone to screw
> up the crypto ("Hey, it would save cycles if we just used a timestamp as
> this "IV" thingy, wouldn't it?").
I already gave the link, but now I've looked at the rest of the site
(shame on me), off the main page is a "common product faults" and
non-random IVs are 6th on the list of both itnerop (RFC interpretation)
and missing criteria requirements. That page hasn't been updated since
last July though, I'll have to see if it can be filled with more recent
data.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
