I'm not 100% sure that ISA isn't still vaporware (in the sense that I don't
think it is GA quite yet). As a result, any numbers would be largely suspect
anyway. I just checked the website though, and for the first time they got
it ICSA certified, which is definitely a step up from Proxy 2.0.
They (MS) look to be pricing it per proc. Looks like it will weigh in at a
similar price as Checkpoint, Raptor, et al.
Wes Noonan, MCSE/MCT/CCNA/NNCSS
Senior QA Rep.
BMC Software, Inc.
(713) 918-2412
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bmc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Nagy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 16:47
To: 'Noonan, Wesley'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Squid vs ISA (WAS: Squid and Samba)
Now that everyone has thrown ALL their toys out of the cot...
Are there any stats done on ISA vs Squid? I'd be interested to see if MS
have produced a proxy that works this time. I don't _think_ I saw an ISA
entry in the last cache bakeoff, but someone might have done some testing
somewhere.
Cheers,
--
Ben Nagy
Network Security Specialist
Marconi Services Australia Pty Ltd
Mb: +61 414 411 520 PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304
(Wes (I think) wrote)
[...]
> > Proxy is free. ISA costs. You get what you pay for.
[...]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
