Uh, out of interest, why would you want to do this?
In any case, it's probably not going to work. We'd need more information
about your firewall / OS before giving you a canonical answer, but in terms
of "theory" I can easily see how having NAT mappings overlapping between two
interfaces would be...troublesome.
It's hard enough trying to NAT to two different external pools with two
different outside interfaces, let alone two interfaces with the same pool.
I'd try and solve your problem a different way.
Cheers,
--
Ben Nagy
Network Security Specialist
Marconi Services Australia Pty Ltd
Mb: +61 414 411 520 PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Tavares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 February 2001 10:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: double masquerade
>
>
> well, was suposed to be simple..
>
> We have a router doing a masquerade, and the firewall NAT
> appears that cant
> create a nat and routing in diferent interfaces but with
> te same scope
> and netmask.
>
> Am I wrong?
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
