I agree.....thank you....now seriously, does anyone know how I can
resolve my issue of being unable to get PortSentry to continue its logging
and blocking of specific IP's?
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Ken Claussen wrote:
> It is quite easily accomplished On Exchange 5.5. There is a setting on the
> Internet Mail Connector advanced tab with a check box, labeled "Do not send
> out of office replies to the internet" There is another labeled "Do not send
> automatic replies to the internet". Microsoft has provided the tools and
> documentation. This would suggest a lack of knowledge on the administrators
> part, assuming the messages were generated from Exchange Server. I would say
> the Jack Dice message is most definately not exchange though, it is not the
> correct format. However several of the other "Out of Office" replies do
> appear to fit the Exchange format. Sorry for the off topic post, but I am
> tired of listening to unfounded criticism of Microsoft products. The
> discussion should always be about security which is directly related,
> although not exclusively, to an administrators Knowledg Base and familiarity
> with a product.
>
> Ken Claussen MCSE CCNA CCA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste!"
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Horsfall
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:24 AM
> To: Firewalls List
> Subject: RE: Auto-responders
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Noonan, Wesley wrote:
>
> > up as the cost of doing business. The days of text mail with no out of
> > office notification is definitely over. If auto responses is the biggest
> of
> > my worries... well, it's been a good day. :)
>
> Funny; I can do it quite easily with my text-based Unix mailer. I don't
> have to annoy anyone who posted to a mailing list, or worse still, the
> *entire* list. I mean, it's of no consequence to me if Jack Dickhead is
> out for lunch when I post to a mailing list, so why the heck should I be
> notified? If anyone ought to receive the silly-ack, it's the list owner.
>
> Or is M$ particularly broken in that respect?
>
> -- Dave
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
