At 07:44 PM 3/10/01 -0800, Steven Pierce wrote: >I agree 100%. Who said that the information crime is something >that is dangerous? There are many thing that are and should be criminal that aren't specifically dangerous. >I have read more then one story that business >are hiring ex hackers for their business to help with security issues. >Who better to know if there is a security hole, but for someone to >that has been in to play (Defeat) with them... I'd be interested in seeing any references you have to even one of those. The question is who should tell you how to secure the security hole. Fred - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- RE: Licensing Information Security Professiona... mht
- RE: Licensing Information Security Profess... Ron DuFresne
- RE: Licensing Information Security Pro... mht
- RE: Licensing Information Security... Ron DuFresne
- RE: Licensing Information Sec... mht
- RE: Licensing Information... Ron DuFresne
- RE: Licensing Information Security Professiona... Frederick M Avolio
- RE: Licensing Information Security Profess... mht
- Re[2]: Licensing Information Security ... Gaute Gullesen
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Information S... Steven Pierce
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Informat... Frederick M Avolio
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Info... Steven Pierce
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Info... Steven Pierce
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Info... Frederick M Avolio
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Info... Steven Pierce
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Informat... mht
- RE: Re[2]: Licensing Information Security Professio... Graham, Randy \(RAW\)
- Re: Re[2]: Licensing Information Security Prof... Carl E. Mankinen
- RE: Re[2]: Licensing Information Security Prof... Steven Pierce
