yes it's no problem... you just run your statics and conduits with no NAT:
assuming two servers one http and one ftp at 10.20.40.60 and 10.20.40.61 for
an example:
nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
static (inside, outside) 10.20.40.60 10.20.40.60 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (inside, outside) 10.20.40.61 10.20.40.61 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
conduit permit tcp host 10.20.40.60 eq www any
conduit permit tcp host 10.20.40.61 eq ftp any
Best of Luck!
-----Original Message-----
From: Chad Markley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Transparent firewall with Cisco Pix
I have a customer that I need to install a Pix firewall for. However, they
are currently running public IP addresses and don't want to change them to
private and utilize NAT and NAPT.
Is the Pix capable of transparent firewalling? I want to put it in front of
their servers and run transparently.
I have searched the TAC for information relative to transparent and firewall
as keywords to no avail.
Any ideas?
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
