Someone might correct me, but I don't think that the ACLs you can use with
bridge-groups are anywhere near as granular as the IP ACLs. I've always
wondered if some hideous CRB (concurrent routing and bridging) setup would
work, but it's all kind of academic and nasty.
Why not just run NAT and use IP ACLs?
--
Ben Nagy
Network Security Specialist
Marconi Services Australia Pty Ltd
Mb: +61 414 411 520 PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JR Ponce de Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cisco Router as Bridge/Firewall.
>
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> Can somebody point me to a good documentation on how to setup
> a Cisco router
> as a Bridge/Firewall?
>
> Our internet provider doesn't allow us to manage their router
> which are in
> our office and we need to setup ACLs. We have another Cisco
> router and I was
> planning to set it up as a kind of Bridge/Firewall between
> the LAN (Real
> IPs) and the NET, but I had never dealed with such kind of config.
>
> Any suggestions will be very appreciated.
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
