On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, it does make it essentially impossible for an outsider to
> scan the internal network, or contact internal machines that do not
> currently have an outbound session in the NAT map.
Just out of curiosity, have there been any cases of software bugs
(buffer overflows or such) that would've allowed an outsider to get
their hands on the active session map?
.pi.
--
Petteri Lyytinen + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + http://www.cs.tut.fi/~typo/
+ Watashi no chikara de susumu +
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Penetrating a NAT Steve Riley \(MCS\)
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael R. Jinks
- Re: Penetrating a NAT patrick kerry
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael Batchelder
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael R. Jinks
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael Batchelder
- RE: Penetrating a NAT Ben Nagy
- Re: Penetrating a NAT dgillett
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Lyytinen Petteri
- Re: Penetrating a NAT mouss
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael Batchelder
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael T. Babcock
- RE: Penetrating a NAT Ben Nagy
- RE: Penetrating a NAT Ben Nagy
- RE: Penetrating a NAT patrick kerry
- RE: Penetrating a NAT dgillett
- RE: Penetrating a NAT Cessna, Michael
- Re: Penetrating a NAT Michael T. Babcock
- RE: Penetrating a NAT Tony Rall
