|
Richard,
Are you looking for a
stand-alone application or a combination of firewall/content filter? We
ran a PIX firewall for a firewall and used (I think it was called)
WebTrends. The speed was in how it worked. The firewall would get a
packet destined for bad-site.com and would send the packet on as well as a
packet to WebTrends asking for the acceptance policy. By the time the
response came back from bad-site.com it had already gotten a response from
WebTrends to either permit or deny responses from that site. If it was
allowed the response passed through the firewall, if not the user was sent a
custom URL that said that the site was restricted. Highly configurable and
fast...
I'm sure there are ton's of
good stand-alone solutions out there...good luck! ;)
David Ishmael, CCNA, IVCP
|
- Re: Content Filtering Bennett Todd
- Re: Content Filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Content Filtering Gavin Kerr
- Re: Content Filtering Roland Wang
- Re: Content Filtering ken
- RE: Content Filtering Randall, Mark
- RE: Content Filtering Andrew Bastien
- RE: Content Filtering bipin
- RE: Content Filtering Darren Pedley
- Content Filtering Richard Ginski
- RE: Content Filtering David Ishmael
- RE: Content Filtering Daniel Crichton
- Re: Content Filtering Jeffery . Gieser
- RE: Content Filtering Ron DuFresne
- RE: Content Filtering David Ishmael
- RE: Content Filtering Ron DuFresne
- RE: Content Filtering Delcourt, Rick
- RE: Content Filtering Zachary Uram
- RE: Content Filtering Bill Royds
- RE: Content Filtering John_G_Taylor
- RE: Content Filtering David Ishmael
