Rusty,
I don't think so. It is like a proof of concept system that to
demonstrate some trust practices (ACLs, etc.). I heard from the
Selinux mailing list that they are no longer pursuing it on its
own and are instead wrapping it into this secure linux module
project.
SDG,
Zach
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Rusty wrote:
> Zachary;
>
> Considering that this is coming from the government and especially the NSA, are
> you sure that this is not a "honey pot" setup?
>
> TIA
>
> Rusty
>
> Zachary Uram wrote:
>
> > I wonder how this will fare against OpenBSD?
> >
> > Zach
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Michael Jinks wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/
> > >
> > >
> > > Zachary Uram wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> More generally, a lot of people much smarter than me (the NSA's Secure
> > > >> Linux team for starters) have said that the only way to combat "hostile
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29
> >
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> --
> "If Democrats wanted Gore to be president so bad,
> they should have voted to convict."
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
