> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> At 14:25 17/06/01 -0700, Sameer R. Manek wrote:
> >Does any one have any recommendations on what we should use to
> implement nat
> >at close to 100mb speeds?
>
> why 100mb? is it because you have 100mb ethernet cards? If so, you'll be
> surprised to
> hear that with these, you can get about 6mb....
Our outbound link hovers around 3-4megabyte/sec which is more then what
ethernet can sustain, that's why we needed to engineer a NAT implimentation
that can sustain close to FE speeds.
>
> Anyway, NAT doesn't reduce perfs dramatically, so it shouldn't be
> a concern
> unless you're
> trying to keep with Gigabit nets...
>
>
> >Cisco router is preferred.
>
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
