Posted yesterday on NANOG: <quote> I'm hearing rumors of problems with the 515 series PIX: '...that in some cases Cisco has opted to replace customers' 515 Pixes with 520's at no charge because the 515 in some cases accepts packets with spoofed source addresses that it should be able to reject.' has anyone heard of this? Far as I know the sw is the same, but hw is different. </quote> I have a number of 515s and haven't heard this. Any truth to this? AFAIK I haven't received any notice from Cisco indicating this. (I'm not sure what source he seems to be quoting so tend not to believe it, but want to be sure... since it is possible I missed something.) Thanks, -Mike -- "Information may want to be free, but fiber optic cable wants to be a million US dollars per mile." --Shawn McMahon _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
