On 13 Dec 2001, at 18:06, Michael Zhao wrote:

> Hi ,
> 
> My former network structuer is as following :
> 
> outside
> |
> fw
> |
> Cisco switches
> |
> |
> |
> WSs  SRVs
> 
> I want add another net segments to my net. I insert two NIC interfaces 
> on my windows nt server 4.0 system ( sp 6a). One NIC connect to switches 
> via the normal cable , and another one connect to a HUB where connected 
> by some clients. I am sure I did the correct multihomed  configuration . 
> I test the routing using ping . I can ping the new clients from the old 
> internal machines but can not do it vice versa. But I can ping both 
> sides between fw and new clients .
> 
> What can I do ? Could anybody give help ?
> Thanks
> 
> Michael

  You probably haven't given us enough information[*].

  However....

> I test the routing using ping. I can ping the new clients from the
> old internal machines but can not do it vice versa.  

  Ping and successful response requires correct packet flow in both 
directions.  So if A can ping B, there cannot be a routing or cabling 
problem preventing B from pinging A.
  The only times that I have seen thie kind of asymmetric pingability 
that you report is when some sort of filtering/firewalling has 
intervened, typically preventing certain ICMP packet types from 
flowing in a specific direction.

  On many hubs, there is an "uplink" port which is actually just a 
cross-over wired alternate connector for the adjacent regular port.  
Strange things can happen if you have machines plugged into both 
connectors.  (In your case, you should not have anything plugged into 
the uplink port, which is for cascading multiple hubs....)

[*]
> I am sure I did the correct multihomed configuration. 
  Not to pick on you personally, but I see an *awful* lot of 
questions from people whose networks aren't working, who will make a 
point of saying that they are *sure* the configuration is correct 
(even though it isn't working...) but don't supply the configuration 
so that those whom they hope will help can *verify* that it is/looks 
correct.

David Gillett

_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to