On 14 Dec 2001, at 16:48, Aaron Jongbloedt wrote: > here ya go...this should explain "mo better" what i am trying to say.... > > > current: > > web.server<------| > real ip#1 | > |------->firebox/firewall > mail.server<------| > real ip#2 > > > > proposed: > > web.server<------| > private ip#1 | > |------->firebox/firewall > mail.server<------| real ip#1,2 > private ip#2 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Valerie Anne Bubb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM > Subject: Re: NAT w/ one to one mapping > >
Well, Valerie's message was *extremely* close to what I had started to draft, and you don't seem to have added any new questions. What part of her answer did you find lacking? DG _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
