The magic port and protocol are tcp 1433

Make sure you have something like the following:

access-list acl-dmz permit tcp host 192.168.1.1 host 192.168.1.x eq 1433

static (inside,dmz1) 192.168.1.x 172.16.y.z netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0


Where 192.168.1.1 is your web server on the DMZ and 172.16.y.z is you
SQL server on the inside.

Obviosly you have to allow outside traffic to the web server, but you
state that is working.

Glenn

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Sahr
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco PIX and MS-SQL

Hi all,
 
Does anyone know how to config a Cisco PIX 515 for SQL/Web traffic? I
have a PIX 515 w/IOS 6.0(1), it has a DMZ interface. I have a MS web
server on the DMZ, and a MS SQL server on the inside interface. The SQL
server is a data backend for the web frontend... I want users to access
the website, but I want to keep the SQL servers protected. Try as I
might I cannot make this work. Ever. I have opened all ports on all
interfaces, I even started a TAC case with Cisco and they don't know why
it doesn't work. All hosts on all ports can ping each other via IP
address, I have verified that all subnets, masks, gateways, etc. are
properly configured. Hosts on the outside interface can see the web
server, can access the site, but can't access the actual data backend. I
even tested the connection between the SQL and Web servers physically
bypassing the PIX, sniffed the port traffic between the machines and
found nothing out of the ordinary.
 
What am I missing here? What magic port or protocol could be blocking
this? Any ideas?
 
TIA for any help...
 
Marc Sahr
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 

_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls


_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to