Simon,

Is there a reason your only running Service Pack 1?  I would recommend
updating to the most recent CP service pack (5).  Don't forget to update
your GUI client also.  I remember some sort of NATing issue with between
site to site VPN's that was fixed with SP3.

Looking over your config, looks like everything you need is in place.
-Created the Object with internal address
-Static NAT to Public IP
-Created Local.arp.  (Now I know this may sound funny, but for
troubleshooting you might want to add the licensed outside NIC's MAC
address also.
Where your outside address is say 200.200.200.20 and your Unix public
address is 200.200.200.21.  Just add both addresses into the local.arp file
with the same MAC.  Also, I've found that this takes a few minutes for the
router to update it's tables after you stop and start.)
-Created the persistant static route.  Though it looks like you have
staticly added the address.  You might want to simply drop the MASK in the
command:
> route ADD -p 200.200.200.21 10.10.10.1 METRIC 1
You don't always nee the METRIC in there also.
> route ADD -p 200.200.200.21 10.10.10.1
SImply telling NT, see this address, send it to this other address.
Don't know if this helps!

Good Luck!

Kevin




Message: 2

--- simon chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi fellow cp users,
>
> we have a nt 4.0 sp6a running checkpoint 2000 sp1.
> We intend to host a unix server so that it can be
> reached
> from the internet.
>
> We've created a a workstation object e.g. Ux giving
> it a
> spare private ip
> address e.g. a.b.c.d and in the NAT tab, we've
> selected
> "Static" and give it
> a public valid IP e.g. w.x.y.z
>
> We've created a local.arp file :
>
> w.x.y.z     <tab> 00-00-E2-33-24-CA
>
> We've also created a permanent route in the NT :
>
> route add -p w.x.y.z mask 255.255.255.255 a.b.c.d
>
> We've added the necessary rules :
> Any       Ux      Any     Accept
>
> We've done fwstop and fwstart.
>
> We were able to access the internet from the Unix
> machine
> but not from
> internet to the unix machine.
>
> We saw from logviewer that it's rejected by rule 0.
> Our Security Policy setting :
> *Either Bund
> * Accept UDP
> * Enable decyption
> * Accept VPN-1 fw connection
> * Accept ICMP     before last
> * Accept outgoing packets from  GW before last
> * log implied rules.
>
>
> What have we done wrong ?
>
>
> tks.
>
>
> rgds,
>
> Simon


_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to