I asked ISS about this very thing and they said you
can't do it.  RealSecure comes installed as a package
on the IP330 but you have to activate it with a key
and I think that's where they get you (one key per
box).  Of course, they could have just been BS'ing me
too!  Even if you could do it, why would you?  Can you
say SLOWWWWW?!
--- Ralph Los <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>       Curious to see if anyone's got this type of setup
> working:
> 
> - Nokia IPxxx platform running some version of
> CheckPoint (>4.1 sp3)
> - Either proprietary, open source, or retail
> software package on the same
> BOX?
> 
>       For example, the one off the top of my head that
> comes to mind
> fastest is running some sort fo IDS on the same box
> as the Nokia/CheckPoint
> firewall-1.
> 
>       My purpose is to take the client hardware and
> maximize the usage for
> the least amount of hardware purchase.  Please don't
> preach about
> single-point of failure...I fully understand
> that...what I'm trying to do is
> get folks who have 'no money to spend on security'
> and give them the most
> for the least money.
> 
> Example:
>       Nokia IP 330
>               - CheckPoint FW-1 (NG) running
>               - ISS RealSecure (or something similar?) running
> 
> Would this cause a resource conflict with promisc
> mode?  Does the CheckPoint
> force-bind itself to EACH NIC that is on the box?
> (haven't tested voyager to
> this extent yet)....
> 
> Thoughts are apreciated, either on-list
> personally...
> 
> ----------------------------------------|
> Ralph M. Los
> Sr. Security Engineer and Trainer
>           EnterEdge Technology, L.L.C.
>           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           (770) 955-9899 x.206
> ----------------------------------------| 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards�
http://movies.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to