Hi All, I'm greatful for all the advise render.
We susepct that the checkpoint crashing could be due to user license exceeded. We approach our CheckPoint Distributor, but they couldn't give us an answer. They said if the license is exceeded, the checkpoint will still allow the workstation to function but after a while the checkpoint will overwhelm the cpu utilization causing the nokia box to crash. Is there an official statement from checkpoint on what happens if the user lic is exceeded ? Will the Logviewer show it, 'cos I couldn't find anything on it. tks. Rgds, Simon On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:04:59 -0500 "James Oryszczyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NG FP1 on the Nokia 100 series is buggy. If you got to > the Nokia Support > Site, it suggests waiting until FP2 and IPSO 3.5. I > Checkpoint FP1 on > Nokia seems buggy. The firewall Commands are slow. > Someone from > Checkpoint acknowledged that this is a problem and FP2 > and IPSO 3.5 > should resolve it. > > > > James > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Ralph Los > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:26 PM > To: 'simon chan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ip120 crash or hang > > > > 2 things: > 1. Read your logs and see if they tell you what > happened > 2. Set up some sort of monitoring package to > check uptime on the > firewall > ..all else fails, reboot! > > ...some standard stuff - but it should get you working > again. I've > worked with a bunch of IP120's and for what it's worth, > I've never seen > one hang/die like that without at least giving an idea in > the logs of > what happened. > > Regards, > Ralph > > -----Original Message----- > From: simon chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ip120 crash or hang > > > > Hi Fw list, > > got a call from the users that they could surf the net or > retrieve their > emails. > > I checked and found my nokia ip 120 (on NG fp1) hang / > freezes /crash this morning. > > I wasn't able to ssh, https to the box. > > OK I panic and rebooted the box and the connection > resume. > > What should I do if this happens again and find out why ? > > > > tks. > > Rgds, > > Simon > > > > On 26 Mar 2002 17:05:01 +0200 > Iain King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *This message was transferred with a trial version of > > CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > Hi, > > On the contrary.. it will work, but is not a good > idea. > > And as > > such it is not supported by Nokia > > > > BR, > > Iain > > > > > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 19:34, ext Simon Chan wrote: > > > > Hi Ralph, > > > > > > > > we understood from our Nokia Distributor that you > can > > either use the Box as a FW1 or a network sensor only, > not both. > > > > > > > > Rgds, > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ralph > > Los > > > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:51 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Question for CheckPoint/Nokia admin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > Curious to see if anyone's got this type > of > > setup working: > > > > > > > > - Nokia IPxxx platform running some version of > > CheckPoint (>4.1 sp3) > > > > - Either proprietary, open source, or retail > > software package on the same BOX? > > > > > > > > For example, the one off the top of my > head > > that comes to mind fastest is running some sort fo IDS > on > > the same box as the Nokia/CheckPoint firewall-1. > > > > > > > > My purpose is to take the client hardware > > and maximize the usage for the least amount of hardware > purchase. > > Please don't preach about single-point of failure...I > fully understand > > > that...what I'm trying to do is get folks who have 'no > money to spend > > on security' and give them the most for the least > money. > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > Nokia IP 330 > > > > - CheckPoint FW-1 (NG) running > > > > - ISS RealSecure (or something > > similar?) running > > > > > > > > Would this cause a resource conflict with promisc > > mode? Does the CheckPoint force-bind itself to EACH > NIC > > that is on the box? (haven't tested voyager to this > > extent yet).... > > > > > > > > Thoughts are apreciated, either on-list > > personally... > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------| > > > > Ralph M. Los > > > > Sr. Security Engineer and Trainer > > > > EnterEdge Technology, L.L.C. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > (770) 955-9899 x.206 > > > > ----------------------------------------| > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Firewalls mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you > have forgotten your > aim." > -George Santayana, Philosopher > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, > etc) Please go > to: http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim." -George Santayana, Philosopher _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
