[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Rule/Policy: Profanity
Has anyone considered the consequences of two "political correctness" (a.k.a. don't sue us!) filters behaving like this one does, and that either - trigger on the word "profanity" itself - or point out the words that triggered the filter - or ones that have a descriptive user-defined rule name like perhaps "Block all sex/porn/illegal shit/spam"? ... and the consequences of _more_ than two such filters? Food for thought. (Hey, maybe you could sue the filter vendor / user for creating a denial of service situation? Now _that_ would be ironic.) -- Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com "Senex semper diu dormit" _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
