Caro Moises Andrè e Cari Tutti, resto sorpreso del fatto che si ritenga debole la discussione sulle scienze sociali. Soprattutto in questi ultimi anni ho comunicato di avere inventato una "Nuova economia" basata proprio sulla terna semiotica della significazione, dell'informazione e della comunicazione. Addirittura il Fis dibattito serrato e avvincente sul processo di tras-informazione o sul triangolo dei tre surplus (neg-entropia naturale e termodinamica, ecobiologica e semiotico-semantica) si ritrova su Internet(google). Mentre una dozzina di volte, se non di più, ho dichiarato che la mia teoria del valore si fonda sulla legge dell'informazione. Per non parlare dei miei numerosissimi libri che ho citato. L'unica attenuante nei confronti di chi esprime giudizi così ingiusti è che io uso la lingua italiana. Ma di questo non mi vergogno nè mi vanto;. è sempre goliardico il mio modo di partecipare alla discussione cercando di tener conto delle altre scienze e del loro linguaggio per quanto m'è possibile e riconoscendo la dignità scientifica di molti dei Vostri interventi. Saluti. Francesco Rizzo.
2015-10-29 10:45 GMT+01:00 Moisés André Nisenbaum < moises.nisenb...@ifrj.edu.br>: > Hi, Pedro. > Hi, FISers. > > I understand that Pedro proposed a discussion about the discussions, and I > think it is very necessary. > There are more than contents in this list, the structure and directions of > the discussions are also important. After all, one of the main objectives > of Information Science is to analyze Scientific Communications (I consider > FIS messages informal scientific communications). So, I am very interested > in this "pause" to discuss discussions. > > Permit to make an analogy. The term "momentum" is used in Physics to > express the amount of movement (*p* = m.*v*). Velocity (*v*) representing > not only speed but also direction and mass representing the inertia. To > change the momentum, you will need force (*F* = d*p*/dt), so it is to > change the momentum of a discussion. Depending on the inertia of > discussion, it can be difficult. As Pedro said, the momenta must be > "aligned": same direction --> more impulse --> we can go farther in less > time. > So, Pedro classified the discussions in five momenta (categories or tags): > 1) Philosophy > 2) Biomolecular (primordials of life and cellular organization) > 3) Organismic and the Neuronal (evolutionary outcomes) > 4) Human Sociality (up to social complexity) > 5) Communication and Information > > Pedro is claiming that 4th and 5th momenta are weak in FIS discussions. > I am doing now a little essay tagging the messages of the last discussion > "Information and Locality". I will count them and see if this unbalanced > momenta is true. > Soon I will publish here the results. > > All the best. > Moisés > > > 2015-10-20 13:31 GMT-02:00 Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es>: > >> Dear FISers, >> >> In response to the recent philosophical exchanges, and curiously waiting >> to see how Steven solves his final posts (Benjamin Peirce is such an >> unjustly forgotten figure, not to speak about his arch-famous son), let me >> try some new "tangent" on the ongoing debate... I see but five different >> and interrelated "momenta" that should be aligned for the hypothetical >> advancement of the common info field. The first one corresponds to >> philosophy, as the critical playground where dissatisfaction with the >> existing views should conduce to attempting more congenial new ways of >> thinking. Unsolved problems of the sciences, when they are general and >> affect several disciplines, easily generate philosophical debate--which can >> be helpful to suggest new inroads. Saying clearly "nope" to some >> philosophical and para-philosophical schools is quite valuable although it >> easily generates irritation and obfuscation in the concerned parties (that >> ingredient of "piquancy" also enlivens the debates). >> >> The second momentum would correspond to the biomolecular (primordials of >> life and cellular organization). The third momentum would wrap around the >> organismic and the neuronal (the evolutionary outcomes of multicellular >> life up to advanced nervous systems). I think they are so obvious that do >> not deserve further comment. >> >> The fourth momentum involves the roots of human sociality, up to the >> historical development of social complexity. And the fifth momentum belongs >> to the contemporary revolution around communication, information, etc. >> These two social momenta are being egregiously forgotten in most of our >> debates (not any more with the planned discussion sessions!) >> >> Unfortunately, none of those momenta --even looking too far away-- should >> be left in the dark. Most of our discussions seem to deal with the >> instrumental aspect, the math theories, constructs, and other knowledge >> bodies that may help to characterize abstractly different structures and >> dynamics where some classes of information seem to be involved. It is not >> difficult to achieve some interesting results in those theoretical and >> para-theoretical realms... but without connecting with some of those big >> momenta, trying to ride on their impetus, it won't be significant. >> A new multidisciplinary itinerary is needed--neither the piece meal nor >> the continuous entanglement would work to achieve it. Personally I find >> that the goal is very difficult. Too many things in too very disperse >> realms have to be cohered... So the allure of this crazy story! >> >> All the best--Pedro >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------- >> Pedro C. Marijuán >> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group >> Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud >> Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) >> Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X >> 50009 Zaragoza, Spain >> Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) >> pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es >> http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fis mailing list >> Fis@listas.unizar.es >> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis >> > > > > -- > Moisés André Nisenbaum > Doutorando IBICT/UFRJ. Professor. Msc. > Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro - IFRJ > Campus Maracanã > moises.nisenb...@ifrj.edu.br > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > >
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
