Dear FISers, Hi!
I found precious comments against the possiblility of black holes produced by 
LHC eating our word:https://press.cern/backgrounders/safety-lhc
https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/could-the-lhc-make-an-earth-killing-black-hole-886d9e600c28#.r85rn6h9y
Ciao! 

Arturo TozziAA Professor Physics, University North TexasPediatrician ASL 
Na2Nord, ItalyComput Intell Lab, University 
Manitobahttp://arturotozzi.webnode.it/ 





----Messaggio originale----

Da: "PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ" <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es>

Data: 05/01/2017 12.06

A: "fis@listas.unizar.es"<fis@listas.unizar.es>

Ogg: [Fis] A Curious Story





-->

Dear FISers,



Herewith the Lecture inaugurating our 2017 sessions.
I really hope that this Curious Story is just that, a curiosity.
But in science we should not look for hopes but for arguments and 
counter-arguments...



Best wishes to All and exciting times for the New Year!
--Pedro









De: Otto E. Rossler [oeros...@yahoo.com]

Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de enero de 2017 17:51

Para: PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ

Asunto: NY session




----------------------



A Curious Story
 
Otto E. Rossler, University of Tübingen, Germany





Maybe I am the only one who finds it curious. Which fact would then make it 
even more curious for me. It
 goes like this: Someone says “I can save your house from a time bomb planted 
into the basement” and you respond by saying “I don’t care.” This curious story 
is taken from the Buddhist bible. 

 
It of course depends on who is offering to help. It could be a lunatic person 
claiming that he
 alone can save the planet from a time-bomb about to be planted into it. In 
that case, there would be no reason to worry. On the other hand, it could also 
be that you, the manager, are a bit high at the moment so that you don't fully 
appreciate the offer made
 to you. How serious is my offer herewith made to you today?
 
I only say that for eight years' time already, there exists no counter-proof in 
the literature to my at
 first highly publicized proof of danger. I was able to demonstrate that the 
miniature black holes officially attempted to be produced at CERN do possess 
two radically new properties:







they
 cannot Hawking evaporate they
 grow exponentially inside matter

 
If these two findings hold water, the current attempt at producing ultra-slow 
miniature black holes on earth
 near the town of Geneva means that the slower-most specimen will get stuck 
inside earth and grow there exponentially to turn the planet into a 2-cm black 
hole after several of undetectable growth. Therefore the current attempt of 
CERN's to produce them near
 Geneva is a bit curious. 
 
What is so curious about CERN's attempt? It is the fact that no one finds it 
curious. I am reminded of an
 old joke: The professor informs the candidate about the outcome of the oral 
exam with the following words “You are bound to laugh but you have flunked the 
test.” I never understood the punchline. I likewise cannot understand why a 
never refuted proof of the
 biggest danger of history leaves everyone unconcerned. Why NOT check an 
unattended piece of luggage on the airport called Earth?
 
 
To my mind, this is the most curious story ever -- for the very reason that 
everyone finds it boring. A
 successful counter-proof would thus alleviate but a single person’s fears – 
mine. You, my dear reader, are thus my last hope that you might be able to 
explain the punch line to me: “Why is it that it does not matter downstairs 
that the first floor is ablaze?”
 I am genuinely curious to learn why attempting planetocide is fun.  Are you 
not?





For J.O.R.



---------------


























_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to