Dear Sung and FIS Colleagues,

We have barely discussed the new notion of Planckian information and the amazing variety of self-organization processes that abide by it. It is a pity for I think it is a relevant conceptualization that can contribute to new developments in our field. Thank you, Sung, for presenting it in this list. What I do not see is the relationship to be established with languages: at cosmic, cellular, and human scales. Is it necessary? Is it convenient? Concretely, in one of the last papers mentioned in the kickoff text there is a explicit reference to the 12 conditions to be fulfilled by any language. Could you please explain those conditions? In the case of living cells, there is no reference at all to signaling systems--how any cellular "language" can be delineated without considering the "speech apparatus" of the cell? The profligate of new terms coined around information, energy, knowledge, etc. does not help either to keep a clear focus in the essential idea, which as expressed above revolves around P.I. --although I recognize that most of them may have some point of interest, taking together they somehow dilute the main message.

Best wishes--Pedro

--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 0
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to