Excuse me, the order is:) References (1) Riofrio, W. (2008) Understanding the Emergence of Cellular Organization. Biosemiotics, 1(3): 361-377. (2) Riofrio, W. (2010a) On Biological Computing, Information and Molecular Networks. In Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles, edited by J. Vallverdú. IGI Global, pp. 53-65. (3) Riofrio, W. and Aguilar, L.A. (2010b) Different Neurons Population Distribution correlates with Topologic-Temporal Dynamic Acoustic Information Flow. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems (New England Complex Systems Institute Book Series: Volume VI), edited by A.A. Minai, D. Braha and Y. Bar-Yam. Springer, pp. 227-234. [1] Sincerely, Walter ------------------------------------------------------------
Walter Riofrio Researcher IPCEM, University Ricardo Palma. Lima-Perú Chercheur Associé; Complex Systems Institute-Paris (ISC-PIF) Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology Email: walter.riof...@iscpif.fr [2] ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro C. Marijuan" pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es To: fis@listas.unizar.es Cc: Sent: mié 15/12/10 10:29 Subject: Fwd: [Fis] Closing Comments? FIS Friends, Like in most of our excursions, in the present one we have stumbled upon a very interesting and exciting "attractor". Rather than throwing ourselves into a deep discussion about the modes of social knowing and their historical interrelationship my suggestion is that we sidestep them and make some "concluding comments" on the ongoing discussion by coming back to the final questions of Prof. Zhong (Yixin in our friendly environment!). I will pen them at the bottom. Concerning the modes of knowledge discussion, next weeks I will make a proposal in order to have it as our next discussion session (immediately after this one, or perhaps after another session which has been tentatively demanded about an "axiomatic approach to information theory".) Let me make another suggestion. In the concluding comments it would be important trying to be as boldest as possible, as well as hearing new voices related to neuroscience, cellular-molecular biology, physics, and artificial intelligence. Thus I kindly demand to the active group of philosophically oriented parties, and to everybody else, to momentarily keep at bay the critical comments --only positive reactions (Christmas time!). All parties who have participated in recent discussions, and particularly the new arrivals into the list, are cordially invited to reflect their brute insights on intelligence and information... maybe just penning three or four lines on a few of the questions below. Thus, these were Yixin's questions: • What is the correct concept of intelligence? • What is the correct concept of information? • What is the precise relation between intelligence and information? • How do you evaluate the current state of the art in the study of intelligence science? • How do you evaluate the current state of the art in the study of information science? • Do you agree with the statement that intelligence comes from knowledge and the latter from information? • What, do you think, is the feasible mechanism of intelligence growth? • Do you think it possible to have information being conversed to knowledge and even to intelligence? best wishes, and season greetings ---Pedro -- ------------------------------------------------- Pedro C. Marijuán Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud Avda. Gómez Laguna, 25, Pl. 11ª 50009 Zaragoza, Spain Telf: 34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) Fax: 34 976 71 5554 pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Este mensaje ha sido verificado por el E-mail Protegido. Antivirus actualizado en 15/12/2010 / Versión: 0.96.4/12392
_______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis