Dear Prof.Zhong, Joseph, Krassimir , Jerry, Steven, Pedro and All,
Thanks Prof. Zhong for you voice and thesis!
Dear Joseph I am moved with the phrase in the mail you reply Krassimir:
“co-exist with 'ours'”. And feel it is really Hopi Native Americans is
wonderful and worthy. The “co-exist” let me think of one of my surprise as an
English learner: con-science means conscience. It becomes a humane word! We
even can make a riddle: “science + … + science = ？” perhaps you speak English
should laugh at me, that is fun, but in fact as a student I remembered this
word just by this way. Yes, and multi-disciplinary, interdisciplinary. A
serious question is: why we can do interdisciplinary thing? Why it is possible?
How does it runs? I thought it and try give an answer- as Prof. Zhong say, a
view to this – I try put out an “equal seriousness Principle”, it is in the new
book the same. What are the same? what are compared? What are measured? While
we transfer, we interdisciplinary? I feel it is “seriousness”. Go on ask: what
is “seriousness”? then we arrive the factor of human itself. Then we arrive
intelligence science. For example why we can say “Vincent van Gogh as a painter
is same great as Beethoven as a musician”? For they arrive same serious with
their own fields.
I have so many replies with these mails. Thanks! More soon.
Best regard,
Chuan
March 7, 2015
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
