Pedro -- In short, how might phenomenology relate to science? There is one approach - to physiology - that was taken by the British physiologist, John B. Haldane. He did ALL his experiments upon himself.
STAN On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es > wrote: > Dear FIS Colleagues, > > Some parties have doubts on how to count the two messages per week --the > maximum allowed in this list except for the discussion chair, which > currently is Alex. Following the international business week, the count > starts on Monday and obviously ends on Sunday night. Not abiding by this > rule leads to posting sanctions. The idea is to keep a reasonable traffic, > to allow participation of more people, and to promote quiet, "reflective" > posting beyond the merely excited and "reactive". Remember that people > willing to check about the recent exchanges may go to: > http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/ > https://www.mail-archive.com/fis@listas.unizar.es/ > > As a brief note to Alex: it is fine that we are discussing all these > curious and advanced themes here (and I do not want to interfere), but > thinking that we are getting close to the end of this whole phenomenology > session, and that Plamen's concluding topic will try to open some inroads > in the applied realm, starting with some contemplation of basic > multidisciplinary questions could be convenient, at least as a bridge. For > instance (in my very personal interpretation): > > 1. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view in a basic > information problem (relationship between "world", "object as living > subject", "inquirer as heterogeneous communities of inquirers"). At least > this is a real problem of mine when trying to update the scheme of cellular > signaling relationships with the environment. > > 2. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view regarding the entire > information problem (transcending the different "provincial" approaches to > information"? > > 3. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view regarding the > multidisciplinary conundrum (the accelerated expansion in the number of > disciplines--several thousands nowadays, probably close to 10,000) and the > more and more difficult synthesis and integration? > > 4. What is the advantage of closely relating phenomenology with Buddhist > "metaphysics" (as has been done continuously in the recent discussions > here)? > > Of course, these are dense points --to disregard "reactively"-- and better > to let them resurface in coming days. Now, in order to facilitate the > ongoing discussion on Godel's, Dr. Albert Johnstone has joined the fis list > today (thanks are due to Maxine). > > Best greetings---Pedro > > ------------------------------------------------- > Pedro C. Marijuán > Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group > Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud > Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) > Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X > 50009 Zaragoza, Spain > Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& > 6818)pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ > ------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > >
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
