Dear all,
My name - Emanuel - in a literal translation means "God with us". Despite of that, for the purpose of our current discussion, I would like to mention: The external observer, which provide us with the needed semantic information used (as a reference) for physical information interpretation, at the very beginning was: or the Nature itself, or (more specific) the natural evolution, or (even more specific) the natural selection. Best regards, Emanuel. ------------------------------------------------ From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 11:36 AM To: Loet Leydesdorff Cc: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Meta-observer? I know him: his name is God, the meta-observer + meta-actor at the same time. Correct, Bruno? ;-) best, Plamen ................... From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Loet Leydesdorff Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 9:53 AM To: Koichiro Matsuno; fis@listas.unizar.es Subject: Re: [Fis] Meta-observer? Dear Pedro, Koichiro, and colleagues, At the level of observers, indeed, a hierarchy may be involved for the change of focus (although this is empirical and not necessarily the case). The communication, however, as a system different from the communicators may contain mechanisms such as "translation" which make it possible to redirect. Best, Loet ------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
