On 1/5/07, Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/5/07, Philip Ganchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > That is indeed a problem. I remember reading an interview with one of > the Unix creators (maybe it was Richie?) about what dissapointed him > in modern Unix/Linux versions, and he mentioned that he thought it was > silly that there where still so many arbitrary system limits, like the > maximum number of arguments passed to execve. He had hoped we would > have moved to dynamic allocations by now. Though I agree with him, > that is really not in the scope of fish.
Well, I just wanted to point out that having "history" be a command instead of a variable nicely sidesteps this problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
