On May 30, 2012, at 6:28 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:43:57AM -0700, ridiculous_fish wrote:
>> - It's all in (sane) C++. No more string_buffer_t, array_list_t, or
>> hash_table_t, and no more halloc!
>
> so it's more like a rewrite than a fork?
It's a fork in the sense that we started with fish trunk, and arrived at the
current state through continuous refactoring. Our git history contains its
entire evolution, and it's generally compilable and testable at every commit.
It can also still merge to/from fish trunk with only minor conflicts. The
current fish_fish branch has merged all changes from trunk.
However, a few components have been completely rewritten, of which history is
the most significant example.
_fish
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
