Agreed that these html files should not be added to the git repo. I understood the suggestion as including the HTML files in any tarballs we provide, not in the repo itself.
There's a script build_tools/make_tarball.sh which outputs a tarball; we could extend this script to include the HTML files. What do you think? _fish On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Elis Axelsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 June 2012 20:15, fish <[email protected]> wrote: >> That seems like an eminently sensible idea. I >> filed https://github.com/ridiculousfish/fishfish/issues/79 to capture >> implementing this. > > I don't agree on this point, git is not meant to have as relleases in > that way imo. I can se a reason to have the manpages precompiled in > release-snapshots of the tree. But putting binary files in the tree > feels wrong. > > One other solution that would help in this case is to have the pages > precompiled and use a git-hook to compile before commiting code that > needs to be compiled. > > --- > Elis "etu" Axelsson > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
