[This message was posted by John Prewett of Lava Trading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to 
the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You 
can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/eef157b5 - 
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

OK, I'm humble enough to eat some pie here.

I didn't notice that the Stipulations themselves were a member the repeating 
group TrdCapRptSideGrp and thus the order of fields becomes significant.

You are absolutely correct.
I thought it strange that you were making a mistake in the first place.
I should have known better.

JohnP

> > Greg, I respectfully suggest that you may have misread the original
> > question.
> 
> John,
> 
> Okay, I may be missing the boat here, but the original question says:
> 
> >For example, in TradeCaptureReport message, we are sending a
> >stipulation block. NoSides(552)=1|Side(54)=1|NoStipulations(232)=1|Sti-
> >pulationType(233)=TEST|StipulationValue(234)=N
> >
> >The other side is rejecting our message, and is saying stipulations
> >"need to be sent later in the message - after the account (tag 1)".
> >
> >In addition, they also complain that we send OrderID tag out of place.
> >They claim we need to send tag NoSides(552), then Side(54), then 37
> >(OrderID). We are sending tag 37 after PartyRole(452).
> 
> In a TradeCaptureReport, the sequence of tags would need to be 552, 54,
> 37, ... 1, ..., then 232...
> 
> Stipulations needs to follow Account since it is part of the
> TrdCapRptSideGrp and that is the order defined in the spec.
> 
> Kind regards, Greg.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to