[This message was posted by Rolf Andersson of Pantor Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b7a4d182 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
All, following up on today's call; a few people on the call today voiced concerns about the added complexity of FAST as a consequence of the pmap field placement proposal. If I understood the comments correctly, the mix of metadata and data would be problematic in some of the current implementations. I'd like to get your comments on this as well as suggestions on how we should go forward. Thx, Rolf [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
