[This message was posted by Brian Manning of Thomson Reuters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/a61dbbb6 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> All, > > following up on today's confcall; > > AFAICT Dan's original proposal doesn't handle leap seconds either. I > need to think some more about the significance of leap seconds for FAST. > > If anyone has thoughts to share please post. > > Best, Rolf Disregard my leap second concern, as it seems most modern day unix clock implementations do adjust for leap seconds. thanks, Brian [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
