[This message was posted by Elton Melo of Santander - Altec Brasil <[email protected]> to the "4.2 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/5. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/3eaa480a - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hello Kou, > Tag 20 and tag 38 should also be taken into account in your cases. Ok, no problem with these tags when busting an execution. > See D19, D20 and D21 for examples on unsolicited cancel, replace and > and reduction. Ok, but these examples don't have "busted executions". They appear in D34 and D35, where tag 150 (ExecType) seems to follow the same value of tag 39 (OrderStatus). One of our FIX partners told me that ExecType would be *aways* 150=4 when the Execution Report is busting an execution -- but I'm not sure about that. Could anyone help? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
