[This message was posted by David Rosenborg of Pantor Engineering AB <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/390413b7 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
SHOULD as in the 1.2 specification is not written yet and this particular tidbit is not covered by the 1.2 extension proposal. But your case 1 is what the proposal should have said, had it been more specific on this matter. /David > If you're using SHOULD (as opposed to saying MUST), then the answer > is 3, right? > > - Craig > > > It should be case 1. The auxiliary identifier is a property of the > > field rather than a property of the type of the field. > > > > /David > > > > > > > In the FAST 1.2 spec, it states: So: <string name=”Foo”> <copy/> > > > </string> translates to: <field name=”Foo”> <string> <copy/> > > > </string> </field> > > > > > > I'd like to know what <string name="Foo" id="12"> <copy/> </string> > > > translates to. Is it > > > 1. <field name=”Foo” id="12"> <string> <copy/> </string> > > > </field> or > > > 2. <field name=”Foo”> <string id="12"> <copy/> </string> > > > </field> or > > > 3. either one is acceptable. > > > > > > Thanks, Craig [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
